The 2019 US Talent Pool: Six Macro Metrics That Matter

by Fraser Marlow

In 2019, smarter workers, fewer layoffs, more quitters, and lower participation add up to a tough talent market for employers 

On January 4th, 2019, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a perplexing note: The month before, the U.S. economy added 312,000 positions, and at the same time, the unemployment rate rose to 3.9%. That’s because 419,000 new workers entered the workforce. In this article, I explore several macro trends of the U.S. labor force.

At Energage, we are all about equipping leaders to unleash potential, inspire performance, and deliver business results through the passion of their team members. Most of these factors are local — it’s about what is going on inside your organization.

But context matters. While it’s true that local variables (leadership, teamwork, appreciation, and purpose) are what matter the most, organizations operate in a broader context as they compete for talent. So today, I want to take a step back and share some perspectives on the state of the U.S. labor market in 2019.

For all of the writing on employee engagement, it’s easy to forget that hiring and retaining talent comes down to supply and demand. During times of high demand (as we are seeing now in the U.S.) the labor market tilts in favor of the ‘suppliers’ or individual workers. Employers face stiff competition for the limited talent pool. Employees who feel they are not getting a fair deal for their skills are more likely to seek options elsewhere.

A Smarter Workforce

First trend: the US labor force is getting smarter.  Or at least better educated.  As the chart below indicates (courtesy of the US census) educational attainment in the US continues to improve with 34% of the population achieving a bachelor’s degree or higher.  Around 10% of the population drops out of education before completing high school – half of what it was a generation ago.  This trend is highly divided down demographic lines (race, income), but overall educational attainment continues to improve.

Unemployment: Way down

The simplest measure of labor supply is, of course, the unemployment rate, which essentially indicates the volume of willing labor that is not currently put to use. So, a quick recap: After a dramatic surge during the recession, unemployment in the U.S. peaked at 10% before gradually recovering to a low of 3.7% in November 2018. The latest confirmed number is 3.8% in December. This is below where we were pre-recession back in May 2007. (Note that I plotted the unemployment rate on the right-hand axis.)

Layoffs: Way down too

Now, let’s overlay the Bureau of Labor Statistics data on ‘Layoffs’ — the monthly rate at which organizations are dropping people from their payroll. From a steady pre-recession rate of 1.3% or 1.4%, we saw a surge to 1.9% a month. All of that unemployment had to come from somewhere, right? But then, organizations rapidly reversed course, and by May of 2010, we were back in the 1.3% zone. Since then, there has been a downtick to 1.1%. Companies just aren’t firing people like they used to, and workers are feeling more confident (1).

Quitting is back in fashion

So, what about people quitting? Before the recession, 2.2% of employees in any given month would hand in their notice. This does not include retirements or long-term sick leave. But as soon as the recession struck, workers battened down the hatches. If you had a job in 2008, you held onto it. The rate dropped as low as 1.3% before starting to recover at the beginning of 2010. At a pace that mirrors the decline in unemployment, workers started to feel more confident about chasing new opportunities. Today, quitters are back in fashion with a vengeance at a 2.4% rate. Clearly ‘quitters’ are not swelling the ranks of the unemployed. They are moving to new jobs or chasing new ventures.

Here is the historical date (‘Quits’ is the blue line):

Wage growth and inflation: Watch this space

As many economists point out, despite these trends we have not yet seen a significant acceleration in wage growth that would drive up inflation, and in turn, interest rates. But, it is reasonable to expect that to come next. If you want to see the Federal Reserve interest rate alongside the rest, it’s shown above in green. While the Federal Reserve responded aggressively by lowering the core rate in 2008, it has been more cautious in responding to the recovery. That said, you will see it start to creep up at the end of 2015. Today, the Federal Reserve is caught between fiscal policy and the politics of Washington, and the general consensus is that rates will go up, albeit cautiously in 2019.

Here is the historical interest rate, as set by the Federal Reserve (green line):

Participation: Where have all the workers gone?

Let’s get back to the labor markets. There is one final data set we need to consider. It’s workforce participation, which is defined as “the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and older that is working or actively looking for work.”

It turns out that the U.S. labor pool had been shrinking, relative to the population as a whole. This trend started in 2000 when the rate peaked around 67% and has declined steadily until 2015(2).  There are several factors behind this trend, but you will notice that it was not affected as strongly by the recession. In fact, it’s after the recession that labor participation rates gradually declined from 66% to 63%. (Note that I plotted this as 60 percentage points plus the right-hand axis so it fits neatly on one graph).

Today, the labor participation rate has steadied at 63% as more people are stepping into the labor market.

The labor participation rate is plotted below in purple on the right-hand axis of 60%+ what the axis reads:

Gig economy? Eh, not so much …

The overall improvement of the job market prompted economists at both Princeton and Harvard to revise downwards their estimates of the size of the so-called ‘Gig Economy’.  They now conclude “the gig economy had scarcely changed the U.S. labor market.”

Gigs, it turns out, were not a new way of building a career, but a make-do solution for workers who, given the choice, would jump to traditional, full-time positions.  This is affecting the pattern of underemployment and explains in part why wages, on the whole, have not risen as expected.

For sure, new platforms like Fiverr and UpWork have allowed some independently-minded folk to set up shop as a contractor, but for the most part, people still want the same thing: a full-time secure job with regular income and good benefits.  Who knew?

Labor’s not fungible

And unlike most markets with fungible commodities (Barrels of oil, bushels of corn…), labor markets are complicated. Workers face geographic constraints (in fact, today Americans are less work-mobile than previous generations (3)) and some skill sets are more marketable than others. While these macro trends tell us which way the wind blows, hiring truly comes down to competing in a specific market and geography, as we often hear from our Top Workplaces winners.

Employers in competitive markets need to insure themselves against the challenges of attracting and retaining talent while keeping their current workforce engaged. They need to double down on creating an employee-centric culture. After all, it’s the lack of internal opportunities or unanswered frustrations that drive your current talent towards the exit. Engaged employees in Top Workplaces are significantly less likely to be considering a move elsewhere.

It’s a tough market for employers…

So, there you have it. Fewer people out of work, fewer people looking for work, fewer people being put out of work, and more people likely to walk out on you. The picture does not look great for employers.

In December 2018, the Chicago Fed reported that more companies were reporting being ‘ghosted’, “a situation in which a worker stops coming to work without notice and then is impossible to contact.”

The Washington Post reported that “Applicants blow off interviews. New hires turn into no-shows. Workers leave one evening and never return.”

What a difference a decade can make!

(1) “You’re Less Likely to Be Laid Off Today Than Any Time Since 1967” by Brad Tuttle – Money Magazine – Aug 08, 2017-
(2) Labor force participation: what has happened since the peak? – Bureau of Labor Statistics September 2016 –
(3) “Fewer Americans Strike Out for New Jobs, Crimping the Recovery” by PATRICIA COHEN – New York Time – May 24, 2016 –

Data sources:

LNS11300000 – Civilian Labor participation rate
JTS00000000QUR – Quits
LNS14000000 – Unemployment rate
JTS00000000LDR – Layoffs & Discharges – Federal Reserve rate